<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ezPublish: slow and crufty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://revjim.net/2004/02/07/ezpublish-slow-and-crufty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://revjim.net/2004/02/07/ezpublish-slow-and-crufty/</link>
	<description>because a Reverend can&#039;t be wrong.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pike</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2004/02/07/ezpublish-slow-and-crufty/comment-page-1/#comment-143196</link>
		<dc:creator>pike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://157c4e86-a559-416d-b42f-9e9894b87e43#comment-143196</guid>
		<description>we&#039;re again one year further. ezpublish *is* being developed quite actively, and its not that things are &#039;not being fixed&#039;. but i&#039;m afraid the above article is still true in all its abstractness. its probably a matter of approach on ezp&#039;s side.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&gt; Oh and performance is definitely not an issue if you can set up APC, etc. few &lt;br&gt;&gt; basic tweaks on the server.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;performance is an issue if performance is an issue. APC and &#039;a few basic tweaks&#039; will improve it a bit, but it would improve performance on any other CMS the same bit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;$2c,&lt;br&gt;*-pike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we&#39;re again one year further. ezpublish *is* being developed quite actively, and its not that things are &#39;not being fixed&#39;. but i&#39;m afraid the above article is still true in all its abstractness. its probably a matter of approach on ezp&#39;s side.</p>
<p>&gt; Oh and performance is definitely not an issue if you can set up APC, etc. few <br />&gt; basic tweaks on the server.</p>
<p>performance is an issue if performance is an issue. APC and &#39;a few basic tweaks&#39; will improve it a bit, but it would improve performance on any other CMS the same bit.</p>
<p>$2c,<br />*-pike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pike</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2004/02/07/ezpublish-slow-and-crufty/comment-page-1/#comment-143180</link>
		<dc:creator>pike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://157c4e86-a559-416d-b42f-9e9894b87e43#comment-143180</guid>
		<description>we&#039;re again one year further. ezpublish *is* being developed quite actively, and its not that things are &#039;not being fixed&#039;. but i&#039;m afraid the above article is still true in all its abstractness. its probably a matter of approach on ezp&#039;s side.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&gt; Oh and performance is definitely not an issue if you can set up APC, etc. few &lt;br&gt;&gt; basic tweaks on the server.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;performance is an issue if performance is an issue. APC and &#039;a few basic tweaks&#039; will improve it a bit, but it would improve performance on any other CMS the same bit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;$2c,&lt;br&gt;*-pike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we&#39;re again one year further. ezpublish *is* being developed quite actively, and its not that things are &#39;not being fixed&#39;. but i&#39;m afraid the above article is still true in all its abstractness. its probably a matter of approach on ezp&#39;s side.</p>
<p>&gt; Oh and performance is definitely not an issue if you can set up APC, etc. few <br />&gt; basic tweaks on the server.</p>
<p>performance is an issue if performance is an issue. APC and &#39;a few basic tweaks&#39; will improve it a bit, but it would improve performance on any other CMS the same bit.</p>
<p>$2c,<br />*-pike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marko</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2004/02/07/ezpublish-slow-and-crufty/comment-page-1/#comment-142147</link>
		<dc:creator>Marko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://157c4e86-a559-416d-b42f-9e9894b87e43#comment-142147</guid>
		<description>As with all systems there is a learning curve. But with all the features available (Content Objects, nodes, XML content area, etc.) I would definitely give it some time. Especialy if you&#039;re building Corporate sites. Oh and performance is definitely not an issue if you can set up APC, etc. few basic tweaks on the server.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with all systems there is a learning curve. But with all the features available (Content Objects, nodes, XML content area, etc.) I would definitely give it some time. Especialy if you&#39;re building Corporate sites. Oh and performance is definitely not an issue if you can set up APC, etc. few basic tweaks on the server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2004/02/07/ezpublish-slow-and-crufty/comment-page-1/#comment-135417</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://157c4e86-a559-416d-b42f-9e9894b87e43#comment-135417</guid>
		<description>Wow. That&#039;s actually shocking that they are still true. This article&lt;br /&gt;is 4 years old. It&#039;s hard to believe the software is still being&lt;br /&gt;developed and this stuff hasn&#039;t been fixed. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. That&#039;s actually shocking that they are still true. This article<br />is 4 years old. It&#039;s hard to believe the software is still being<br />developed and this stuff hasn&#039;t been fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2004/02/07/ezpublish-slow-and-crufty/comment-page-1/#comment-135391</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://157c4e86-a559-416d-b42f-9e9894b87e43#comment-135391</guid>
		<description>Wow. That&#039;s actually shocking that they are still true. This article is 4 years old. It&#039;s hard to believe the software is still being developed and this stuff hasn&#039;t been fixed. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. That&#039;s actually shocking that they are still true. This article is 4 years old. It&#039;s hard to believe the software is still being developed and this stuff hasn&#039;t been fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel F. Kudwien</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2004/02/07/ezpublish-slow-and-crufty/comment-page-1/#comment-135382</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel F. Kudwien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://157c4e86-a559-416d-b42f-9e9894b87e43#comment-135382</guid>
		<description>Well, most of the points in this article are still true and valid.  I guess I found your blog post, because I could not believe that eZ Publish actually performs so bad, looking for potential oversights on the net. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, most of the points in this article are still true and valid.  I guess I found your blog post, because I could not believe that eZ Publish actually performs so bad, looking for potential oversights on the net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Reverend</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2004/02/07/ezpublish-slow-and-crufty/comment-page-1/#comment-134811</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://157c4e86-a559-416d-b42f-9e9894b87e43#comment-134811</guid>
		<description>This post is quite old. I&#039;m not sure what the state of EZPublish is these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is quite old. I&#39;m not sure what the state of EZPublish is these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel F. Kudwien</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2004/02/07/ezpublish-slow-and-crufty/comment-page-1/#comment-134810</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel F. Kudwien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://157c4e86-a559-416d-b42f-9e9894b87e43#comment-134810</guid>
		<description>You should definitely have a look at Drupal.  I needed to review eZ publish for a client and was appalled at how bad eZ publish performs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should definitely have a look at Drupal.  I needed to review eZ publish for a client and was appalled at how bad eZ publish performs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

