Comments on: Separation of Thought http://revjim.net/2006/03/07/separation-of-thought/ because a Reverend can't be wrong. Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:11:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Jonathan http://revjim.net/2006/03/07/separation-of-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-54 Jonathan Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:54:52 +0000 http://revjim.net/2006/03/07/separation-of-thought/#comment-54 i'm waiting until you figure out this whole separation thing then i'll react ;) seriously, i just gave up long ago (before i started, really) on trying to separate stuff. recently (last summer i guess it was) i started my photo blog for posting photos, as i know a lot of people who just prefer to look at photos instead of entries for certain bloggers. other than that, it's all public. hell, i don't even use subjects/titles for my entries. anything that i'm willing to share with more than one friend i'm willing to make public. i don't lie, and i do my best to not speak ill of anyone, so i don't have anything to hide. however, that said, i would prefer some form of categorization for nostalgia/archival purposes. i think LJ addresses that with their tags, but i haven't used it yet, though i like it's flexibility (i.e. zero or more 'categories' per entry). what i'm looking for is hierarchical dynamically-categorical knowledge-base for permanent archival of research, ideas, findings, and possibly collaboration. i like wiki, but it doesn't seem to be conducive to a hierarchical implementation. i'd like to use it for a general knowledge base for myself, a separate one for documentation for work, and a separate one for photoclub. bonus points if they can be dynamically linked. does that make sense, or do i have the brain worms? i’m waiting until you figure out this whole separation thing then i’ll react ;)

seriously, i just gave up long ago (before i started, really) on trying to separate stuff. recently (last summer i guess it was) i started my photo blog for posting photos, as i know a lot of people who just prefer to look at photos instead of entries for certain bloggers.

other than that, it’s all public. hell, i don’t even use subjects/titles for my entries. anything that i’m willing to share with more than one friend i’m willing to make public. i don’t lie, and i do my best to not speak ill of anyone, so i don’t have anything to hide.

however, that said, i would prefer some form of categorization for nostalgia/archival purposes. i think LJ addresses that with their tags, but i haven’t used it yet, though i like it’s flexibility (i.e. zero or more ‘categories’ per entry).

what i’m looking for is hierarchical dynamically-categorical knowledge-base for permanent archival of research, ideas, findings, and possibly collaboration. i like wiki, but it doesn’t seem to be conducive to a hierarchical implementation. i’d like to use it for a general knowledge base for myself, a separate one for documentation for work, and a separate one for photoclub. bonus points if they can be dynamically linked.

does that make sense, or do i have the brain worms?

]]> By: sunshine_mama@livejournal.com http://revjim.net/2006/03/07/separation-of-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-48 sunshine_mama@livejournal.com Wed, 08 Mar 2006 14:31:30 +0000 http://revjim.net/2006/03/07/separation-of-thought/#comment-48 Most of us don't do anywhere near the job that you do at categorizing. I pretty much lay it all out on the line, and if anyone wants to separate it, they can worry about that. You are waaay organized - kudos to you for being able to be that. I suck at organizing. Anything. Most of us don’t do anywhere near the job that you do at categorizing. I pretty much lay it all out on the line, and if anyone wants to separate it, they can worry about that. You are waaay organized – kudos to you for being able to be that. I suck at organizing. Anything.

]]> By: cranialstrain@livejournal.com http://revjim.net/2006/03/07/separation-of-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-47 cranialstrain@livejournal.com Tue, 07 Mar 2006 23:12:14 +0000 http://revjim.net/2006/03/07/separation-of-thought/#comment-47 I tend to fight my natural inclination to 'seperate' (or more accurately 'segregate') those reading what I write. I think it's important to present a balanced view of ones-self otherwise it leaves me with little right to complain if I'm then misunderstood or perceived inaccurately. Journal-wise, for me, it would very much a case of what is 'personal' and what is 'not personal'; therefore someone who is interested in my photography (or technology interests) would not have access to my personal introspective ramblings about life, beliefs, politics, family news - unless they specifically befriended me for such. I tend to fight my natural inclination to ‘seperate’ (or more accurately ‘segregate’) those reading what I write. I think it’s important to present a balanced view of ones-self otherwise it leaves me with little right to complain if I’m then misunderstood or perceived inaccurately.

Journal-wise, for me, it would very much a case of what is ‘personal’ and what is ‘not personal’; therefore someone who is interested in my photography (or technology interests) would not have access to my personal introspective ramblings about life, beliefs, politics, family news – unless they specifically befriended me for such.

]]> By: Rob... http://revjim.net/2006/03/07/separation-of-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-46 Rob... Tue, 07 Mar 2006 20:55:08 +0000 http://revjim.net/2006/03/07/separation-of-thought/#comment-46 Two journals: 1 for "anonymous" and one for everything else. On the "everything else" journal, have multiple RSS feeds: one per category. i.e. Let the user worry about it. It's their problem, not yours. Two journals: 1 for “anonymous” and one for everything else.

On the “everything else” journal, have multiple RSS feeds: one per category.

i.e. Let the user worry about it. It’s their problem, not yours.

]]> By: stacey http://revjim.net/2006/03/07/separation-of-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-45 stacey Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:41:29 +0000 http://revjim.net/2006/03/07/separation-of-thought/#comment-45 separation? nope. it's almost all out there. what needs to be "separated" just gets completely left out. separation? nope. it’s almost all out there. what needs to be “separated” just gets completely left out.

]]> By: Vita http://revjim.net/2006/03/07/separation-of-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-44 Vita Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:31:29 +0000 http://revjim.net/2006/03/07/separation-of-thought/#comment-44 I remember feeling that way when my nephew was first born. Then I got to get up with him a few times in the middle of the night, and listen to his tantrums (he had one in my car this past weekend).... and now i wonder if i want kids at all! After all, i do have him to play with if I feel the need. ;) There is no method to my madness. Sorry I can't offer more insight. I remember feeling that way when my nephew was first born. Then I got to get up with him a few times in the middle of the night, and listen to his tantrums (he had one in my car this past weekend)…. and now i wonder if i want kids at all! After all, i do have him to play with if I feel the need. ;)

There is no method to my madness. Sorry I can’t offer more insight.

]]>