<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: state of the book</title>
	<atom:link href="http://revjim.net/2006/08/04/state-of-the-book/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://revjim.net/2006/08/04/state-of-the-book/</link>
	<description>because a Reverend can&#039;t be wrong.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 16:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: vaxocentric</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2006/08/04/state-of-the-book/comment-page-1/#comment-12363</link>
		<dc:creator>vaxocentric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 02:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revjim.net/2006/08/04/state-of-the-book/#comment-12363</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got a very good InDesign CS tutorial from Lynda.com if you would like to maintain an offsite backup of it for me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a very good InDesign CS tutorial from Lynda.com if you would like to maintain an offsite backup of it for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liz</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2006/08/04/state-of-the-book/comment-page-1/#comment-11265</link>
		<dc:creator>liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revjim.net/2006/08/04/state-of-the-book/#comment-11265</guid>
		<description>I would definitely do another proof before getting the rest, even though it sets you back time-wise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definitely do another proof before getting the rest, even though it sets you back time-wise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://mydnytfyr.livejournal.com/</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2006/08/04/state-of-the-book/comment-page-1/#comment-11261</link>
		<dc:creator>http://mydnytfyr.livejournal.com/</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revjim.net/2006/08/04/state-of-the-book/#comment-11261</guid>
		<description>Economically, doing another proof makes the most sense.  I like the idea of being able to pimp you out longer.  I just put up a post...I am excited to be on the pre-order for this one! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economically, doing another proof makes the most sense.  I like the idea of being able to pimp you out longer.  I just put up a post&#8230;I am excited to be on the pre-order for this one! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

