<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I need MORE TV!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://revjim.net/2007/09/20/i-need-more-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://revjim.net/2007/09/20/i-need-more-tv/</link>
	<description>because a Reverend can&#039;t be wrong.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 16:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: http://axodys.livejournal.com/</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2007/09/20/i-need-more-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-124574</link>
		<dc:creator>http://axodys.livejournal.com/</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revjim.net/2007/09/20/i-need-more-tv/#comment-124574</guid>
		<description>We bought that Samsung model from Amazon about a month ago.  They had it with free shipping for 900+sales tax.  It&#039;s a great TV.  I haven&#039;t noticed any color wheel weirdness (but you&#039;ll probably want to check it out firsthand).  I feel like the image quality is as good or better than my father-in-laws 42&quot; plasma (and bigger too of course).  50&quot; is a really nice size- it&#039;s great for HD, but when you&#039;re running a standard definition channel the picture is also really good and the black bars on the side blend into the case so they&#039;re less distracting than any other HDTV I&#039;ve come across.  It&#039;s looks fine outside 45° as well.

The downside of DLP of course is that the lamp will wear out somewhere in the neighborhood of 5000 hours of use.  A replacement bulb can be ordered online and runs roughly $200.  The color wheels can also wear out (they are rotating at 14,000 rpms after all), but they&#039;re also user replaceable if you&#039;re comfortable with computer hardware fiddling.  For me the fact that the parts that can fail are user serviceable by  a tech savvy person was a definite plus rather than a drawback.  

I suggest you take a look at the Samsung in person and see what you think.  I&#039;m definitely a fan of DLP when it comes to price and performance.  Hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We bought that Samsung model from Amazon about a month ago.  They had it with free shipping for 900+sales tax.  It&#8217;s a great TV.  I haven&#8217;t noticed any color wheel weirdness (but you&#8217;ll probably want to check it out firsthand).  I feel like the image quality is as good or better than my father-in-laws 42&#8243; plasma (and bigger too of course).  50&#8243; is a really nice size- it&#8217;s great for HD, but when you&#8217;re running a standard definition channel the picture is also really good and the black bars on the side blend into the case so they&#8217;re less distracting than any other HDTV I&#8217;ve come across.  It&#8217;s looks fine outside 45° as well.</p>
<p>The downside of DLP of course is that the lamp will wear out somewhere in the neighborhood of 5000 hours of use.  A replacement bulb can be ordered online and runs roughly $200.  The color wheels can also wear out (they are rotating at 14,000 rpms after all), but they&#8217;re also user replaceable if you&#8217;re comfortable with computer hardware fiddling.  For me the fact that the parts that can fail are user serviceable by  a tech savvy person was a definite plus rather than a drawback.  </p>
<p>I suggest you take a look at the Samsung in person and see what you think.  I&#8217;m definitely a fan of DLP when it comes to price and performance.  Hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

