<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: guess what?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://revjim.net/2008/02/22/guess-what/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://revjim.net/2008/02/22/guess-what/</link>
	<description>because a Reverend can&#039;t be wrong.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:20:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2008/02/22/guess-what/comment-page-1/#comment-143401</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revjim.net/2008/02/22/guess-what/#comment-143401</guid>
		<description>Ha. I&#039;ll share. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha. I&#39;ll share. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Reverend</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2008/02/22/guess-what/comment-page-1/#comment-134652</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revjim.net/2008/02/22/guess-what/#comment-134652</guid>
		<description>Ha. I&#039;ll share. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha. I&#39;ll share. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennafurless</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2008/02/22/guess-what/comment-page-1/#comment-134651</link>
		<dc:creator>jennafurless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revjim.net/2008/02/22/guess-what/#comment-134651</guid>
		<description>you fucker.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:D  i&#039;m SO jealous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you fucker.</p>
<p>:D  i&#39;m SO jealous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Reverend</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2008/02/22/guess-what/comment-page-1/#comment-134650</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revjim.net/2008/02/22/guess-what/#comment-134650</guid>
		<description>My dad has a D200 and, after using his quite a bit, while there are certainly improvements, I don&#039;t think I&#039;d consider it justified enough to throw $700-$1000 down for (assuming you&#039;d sell the D200). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LiveView is cool, but not really all THAT useful. Maybe doing tedious amounts of portrait sessions. Maybe.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Noise management is indeed awesome. And those that are &quot;noisy&quot; look more like film grain and retain a LOT more detail than I&#039;ve seen in the past.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bigger Screen is always nice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Way better battery life.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think your plan is a good one. Keep the D200 and hold out for a D3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My dad has a D200 and, after using his quite a bit, while there are certainly improvements, I don&#39;t think I&#39;d consider it justified enough to throw $700-$1000 down for (assuming you&#39;d sell the D200). </p>
<p>LiveView is cool, but not really all THAT useful. Maybe doing tedious amounts of portrait sessions. Maybe.  </p>
<p>Noise management is indeed awesome. And those that are "noisy" look more like film grain and retain a LOT more detail than I&#39;ve seen in the past.</p>
<p>Bigger Screen is always nice.</p>
<p>Way better battery life.</p>
<p>I think your plan is a good one. Keep the D200 and hold out for a D3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vaxocentric</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2008/02/22/guess-what/comment-page-1/#comment-134649</link>
		<dc:creator>vaxocentric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revjim.net/2008/02/22/guess-what/#comment-134649</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m quite jealous of your new toy. I hear the noise management is phenomenal. If my D200 wasn&#039;t completely adequate for my needs, I&#039;d go with the D300. I&#039;m still toying with the thought of going with the D3, but I think I&#039;ll wait for the next model to come out (maybe D3X...) so it pushes the price down (maybe.. didn&#039;t do it much for the D2-D2X). Really, it&#039;s so I can have a full-frame sensor for portraits (for the shallow DoF). But that&#039;s pretty damn hard to justify the price until I start doing more portraiture and have a demand for that image style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m quite jealous of your new toy. I hear the noise management is phenomenal. If my D200 wasn&#39;t completely adequate for my needs, I&#39;d go with the D300. I&#39;m still toying with the thought of going with the D3, but I think I&#39;ll wait for the next model to come out (maybe D3X&#8230;) so it pushes the price down (maybe.. didn&#39;t do it much for the D2-D2X). Really, it&#39;s so I can have a full-frame sensor for portraits (for the shallow DoF). But that&#39;s pretty damn hard to justify the price until I start doing more portraiture and have a demand for that image style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Reverend</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2008/02/22/guess-what/comment-page-1/#comment-134648</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revjim.net/2008/02/22/guess-what/#comment-134648</guid>
		<description>Insert witty remark here to make up for the fact that Disqus didn&#039;t quite work as expected when attempting to approve a comment without responding to it via email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insert witty remark here to make up for the fact that Disqus didn&#39;t quite work as expected when attempting to approve a comment without responding to it via email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob...</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2008/02/22/guess-what/comment-page-1/#comment-134647</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revjim.net/2008/02/22/guess-what/#comment-134647</guid>
		<description>Congratulations! Though I was half-expecting you to go for a 5D.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rob...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations! Though I was half-expecting you to go for a 5D.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Rob&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
