<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A new Gallery Host?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://revjim.net/2008/02/25/a-new-gallery-host/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://revjim.net/2008/02/25/a-new-gallery-host/</link>
	<description>because a Reverend can&#039;t be wrong.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:20:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Reverend</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2008/02/25/a-new-gallery-host/comment-page-1/#comment-134745</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revjim.net/2008/02/25/a-new-gallery-host/#comment-134745</guid>
		<description>Thank you, sir. I really appreciate the feedback.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That was my thought too. The look and feel of the site alone makes it&lt;br&gt;feel more professional, and more serious about itself. As far as&lt;br&gt;prints go, using MPix goes a long way for that as well as they are one&lt;br&gt;of the best online print makers in the US.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They take a bit more of a profit cut, they cost a bit more every&lt;br&gt;month, and there are a few features that are simply missing. But,&lt;br&gt;despite all of that, it just seems like a better service.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m glad you agree with me. I&#039;m considering switching and that&#039;s the&lt;br&gt;direction I was leaning. It&#039;s nice to have someone else&#039;s opinion to&lt;br&gt;back that up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, sir. I really appreciate the feedback.</p>
<p>That was my thought too. The look and feel of the site alone makes it<br />feel more professional, and more serious about itself. As far as<br />prints go, using MPix goes a long way for that as well as they are one<br />of the best online print makers in the US.</p>
<p>They take a bit more of a profit cut, they cost a bit more every<br />month, and there are a few features that are simply missing. But,<br />despite all of that, it just seems like a better service.</p>
<p>I&#39;m glad you agree with me. I&#39;m considering switching and that&#39;s the<br />direction I was leaning. It&#39;s nice to have someone else&#39;s opinion to<br />back that up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cranialstrain</title>
		<link>http://revjim.net/2008/02/25/a-new-gallery-host/comment-page-1/#comment-134744</link>
		<dc:creator>Cranialstrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revjim.net/2008/02/25/a-new-gallery-host/#comment-134744</guid>
		<description>I must confess that when going to buy prints from any independent photographer I am also going to feel more confident when the site instills a sense of confidence in me, especially when passing over credit card details.  How you instill &#039;said confidence&#039; is probably different for each of us, but for me it&#039;s definitely a professional and polished feel, in addition to properly though out processes and help sheets.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jumping straight to Zenfolio it has my immediate attention in this area, it is not only intuitive but pretty and polished with it; more so as a customer it allows me to purchase a print both quick and easily (e.g. without having to register, I can purchase as &#039;guest&#039;).  The interface for actually viewing photographs is indeed very nice, and only the sliding (initially hidden) picture menu being a possible area for confusion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As an international buyer I also pleasantly surprised by the shipping costs; enticing photographers to use this site would appear easy with the rich feature set, but if you&#039;re customer then gets charged astronomically for prints and shipping you&#039;re going nowhere fast.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So the answer the ultimate question, am I more likely to buy a print via Zenfolio than ExposureManager? Definitely!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must confess that when going to buy prints from any independent photographer I am also going to feel more confident when the site instills a sense of confidence in me, especially when passing over credit card details.  How you instill &#39;said confidence&#39; is probably different for each of us, but for me it&#39;s definitely a professional and polished feel, in addition to properly though out processes and help sheets.</p>
<p>Jumping straight to Zenfolio it has my immediate attention in this area, it is not only intuitive but pretty and polished with it; more so as a customer it allows me to purchase a print both quick and easily (e.g. without having to register, I can purchase as &#39;guest&#39;).  The interface for actually viewing photographs is indeed very nice, and only the sliding (initially hidden) picture menu being a possible area for confusion.</p>
<p>As an international buyer I also pleasantly surprised by the shipping costs; enticing photographers to use this site would appear easy with the rich feature set, but if you&#39;re customer then gets charged astronomically for prints and shipping you&#39;re going nowhere fast.</p>
<p>So the answer the ultimate question, am I more likely to buy a print via Zenfolio than ExposureManager? Definitely!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
