revjim.net

on spirituality without religion

Something tells me I should just keep writing, even if I don’t really have anything to say. So, I’ll keep it up until either I get bored or you all do.

Today is Sunday which, at least here in North America, means “church day” for a lot of people.

Yesterday I wrote this:

much like God, it’s easier for me to define love in what it isn’t instead of what it is.

Now that I really consider it, when trying to state what they are, I often define God and Love in almost exactly the same way.

Despite religious upbringing of several different varieties, with exception of a few pockets here and there, I’ve never been a very religious person. Don’t confuse “religious” with “spiritual” however, as I am a very spiritual person. I just never could get into the doctrine and dogma that comes with “religion”. If you consider for a second that even if you only selected 50% of the people of this planet to consider as genuinely good natured, we are all, every inhabitant of this planet, still damned to some less than ideal afterlife by at least one of them.

I love the concept of religion. I love ritual and tradition. I love meaning. I love using smaller, simpler tools to explain larger, more difficult concepts. What I don’t like about religion is that fact that they are all so eager to decide that everyone else is wrong.

I recently answered a silly poll question with a very serious answer. The question was “Do you really believe in the ‘bad things come in 3′s’ thing?”. I wrote:

I think we perceive things in ways that help us to understand them. By grouping things into threes it helps us understand that there is more to come, but also that there is an end. We see patterns because patterns help us understand.

Take this from Hinduism if you will: Brahman is the infinite, transcendent reality which is the Divine Ground of everything. In other words, Brahman is the highest and truest “God”. But understanding such a profound concept is difficult for even the most devout and learned. So, put simply, Hinduism has many, MANY Gods: personifications of various aspects of the infinite Brahman. Patterns detected in the whole of divinity and put into a shape and size that we humans can absorb and interpret and apply.

Hinduism uses two different words here. Saguna Brahman to indicate the “God” with form and traits and therefore, often, doctrine and dogma. And then there is Nirguna Brahman, the formless “God” that represents all things. Yet even Hindus with this great understanding of the true nature of “God” often focus more on the Saguna Brahman because it is so much more accessible and identifiable.

Which leads me to why I am so happy to have found a Unitarian Universalist Congregation. Don’t worry. This isn’t a pitch. I’m not trying to sign anyone up. I don’t get points with God for bringing you to the light nor do I get some kind of eternal credit for saving your soul nor do I believe that most souls even need saving.

We UUs are bounded together by our spirituality. However, we also collectively recognize the purpose of dogma and the personification of God. We don’t deny the usefulness of that personification, nor do we try to discourage it’s use or practice. Instead, in fact, we take from the stories and teachings of many religions and incorporate them into our own teachings, allowing each person to pick and choose which stories mean the most to them. In the end, we’re all left with a shared sense of love, community, and belonging, and a melting pot of “I believe” to share with one another.

It’s not perfect, of course. Nothing is. We all carry so much dogma and such a great sense of competition and righteousness that it’s often hard to let it all go. But we try. When it comes to discussing spiritual matters and matters of the heart, it’s one of the most comfortable places I’ve ever spoken up and felt accepted.

I hope that whoever you are, where ever you are, if you’ve learned anything at all about God, the most important of all of it can be summed up in these Beatles lyrics:

There’s nothing you can do that can’t be done.
Nothing you can sing that can’t be sung.
Nothing you can say but you can learn how to play the game.
It’s Easy…

There’s nothing you can make that can’t be made.
No one you can save that can’t be saved.
Nothing you can do but learn how to be you in time.
It’s Easy…

There’s nothing you can know that isn’t known.
Nothing you can see that isn’t shown.
There’s nowhere you can be that isn’t where you’re meant to be.
It’s Easy…

All you need is Love.
All you need is Love.
All you need is Love, LOVE!
Love is all you need!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Josh-D-S-Davis/523910626 Josh-D. S. Davis

    yAy!

    UU seems similar to Hicksite Quaker. I still fear any organization of religion and consider my friends my church and the universe my God and love as the conduit through which we can improve the world and commune in a useful fashion with the meta.

    I find that Christianity itself is not necessarily in conflict with this. The “Holy Spirit” as the universal consciousness, and love is espoused as the prime directive by Jesus as shown in Matthew 22, Mark 12, Galatians 5, Leviticus 19, Romans 13, Luke 10, and James 2.

    Because of differences in the beliefs of the sources of the books of the Bible, many people do not share this belief that love is the key and binds us all.

    Every time I look up UU, it seems good. Part of me wishes I saw a benefit in it for me, because of the communal nature.

    I'm too sleepy to be writing, and my trashcan stinks.

  • http://revjim.net/ Jim Reverend

    Christianity is, indeed NOT in conflict with any of this, except for one aspect. An aspect that many UU (and other) scholars contest as not being of Jesus Christ in the first place. That aspect is belief that Jesus was/is indeed the actual SON of God and was fully and entirely GOD (more so that us regular folk) walking the Earth and that, salvation is achieved only be belief in this fact.

    The core teachings of Christianity and the amazing man that was Jesus Christ are completely inline with UU “belief”. However, a “true Christian” generally wouldn't fit in UU environment since it would their belief that they were the only ones saved.

    What's so hard for me is that, of all the prophets and teachers that ever got the message “right”, I feel that Jesus was the closest. It's sad that his message has been so distorted. Because I believe all he was ever trying to tell the Jews was “hey guys! You don't need any of that old crap and silly laws any more. Just LOVE one another, and believe that you each have it in you to see the eternal kingdom. God is in each of us. And if you should ever find yourself unable to see that, minimalize your life and you will find it shining there in your core once again.”

    Basically… Jesus was a Buddhist. Sorta. Ha.

    If you already have a platform for community, social action, shared belief, and fellowship, then UU won't be much for you. For me, despite the open nature of many of my friends, regular spiritual fellowship, and unified social action is not as focused or determined as it is as a UU.

  • http://www.precisiontrials.com/ clinicaltrials

    I think love is the underlying theme of any Religion

  • http://revjim.net/ Jim Reverend

    (your comment clearly comes from a spammers account, yet it is oddly accurate, so I'm letting it stay)

    In most cases, you're right… it is. It's the other crap that seems to get in the way and causes the mess. This is really the fundamental core of UU.

    Every Religion believes in Love. So… every religion is acceptable and right and good… as long as you strip away everything else that isn't love.

  • http://www.precisiontrials.com/ clinicaltrials

    Not a spammer account

    I don't believe that it is the religion that doesn't have love, it is the
    choices of people who don't represent love

  • http://revjim.net/ Jim Reverend

    (really? not a spammer account? with the name, the email address, and the website being linked too, this accounts seems VERY commercial. But, I guess that's possible, and it could still be a valid comment. I forget there are a few non-spammer uses for commerce. I'm glad I let the comment remain then. :))

    You are 100% right, again. The religions all have love. And I believe in the genuine goodness inherent in most people. How it is that so many people have lost love for one another outside of their religion I don't know. I think perhaps, being so old and so easily manipulated, religion has become a creature of its own, with less than pure motives.

  • T. L. H.

    I think many many of us feel something along these lines. We're just not sure where the real line is, if there is one. Well put. Thanks for the opportunity to think.

  • http://contrepirates.livejournal.com/ Anya

    Hiya, I found your LJ through common interest in photography (but UU was an unexpected one too :D ), and added you to my friendslist there, hope you don't mind!

  • http://revjim.net/ Jim Reverend

    Of course I don't mind. Not in the least.

  • http://contrepirates.livejournal.com/ Anya

    Hiya, I found your LJ through common interest in photography (but UU was an unexpected one too :D ), and added you to my friendslist there, hope you don't mind!

  • http://revjim.net/ Daniel

    Of course I don't mind. Not in the least.